<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
  <channel>
    <title>metastable</title>
    <link>https://metastable.cc/</link>
    <description>This blog exists in the gap between two more sensible states</description>
    <pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2026 12:24:05 +0000</pubDate>
    <item>
      <title>Why haven&#39;t you progressed to POSITION in your career?</title>
      <link>https://metastable.cc/why-havent-you-progressed-to-position-in-your-career</link>
      <description>&lt;![CDATA[Those that know my $PERSON know that I&#39;ve been around my industry more than 50% of my life already. I&#39;ve worked hard, suffered hard, did stupid things, clever things, helped a shitton of people and undervalued myself forever.&#xA;&#xA;And one question always comes up, what are you still doing in $POSITION if you could easily get a $MASSIVELYBETTERPOSITION?&#xA;&#xA;The simple answer that I can say is: for the love of the game. Sorry. The reality involves a bit more gritty thinking, let&#39;s get into it:&#xA;&#xA;We all know our lives are laid out in vertical responsibility structures, you work, you have a boss, that boss has a boss, etc. it what they call the career ladder; you&#39;re supposed to start at the bottom and climb your way to the top while stopping floor by floor helping around. The thing is; if everyone climbs to the top, who does the tasks at the bottom?&#xA;&#xA;I love my profession. I have the capability to (and accidentally I&#39;ve had to) become a high-level manager, but there&#39;s a few problems: they don&#39;t do crap, let me explain: they don&#39;t build, create, or solve issues. They coordinate, steer the company and think of ways of making money, that&#39;s their function and I don&#39;t find that fulfilling in any way whatsoever. I&#39;m not helping anyone but myself, and I aspire to more than that.&#xA;&#xA;So I refuse to climb the ladder, I&#39;ll stay here, building, creating and fixing, because at the end of the day, throwing money bills at a toilet doesn&#39;t fix the float and fill valve, a wrench does.]]&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Those that know my <em>$PERSON</em> know that I&#39;ve been around my industry more than 50% of my life already. I&#39;ve worked hard, suffered hard, did stupid things, clever things, helped a shitton of people and undervalued myself forever.</p>

<p>And one question always comes up, what are you still doing in <em>$POSITION</em> if you could easily get a <em>$MASSIVELY<em>BETTER</em>POSITION</em>?</p>

<p>The simple answer that I can say is: for the love of the game. Sorry. The reality involves a bit more gritty thinking, let&#39;s get into it:</p>

<p>We all know our lives are laid out in vertical responsibility structures, you work, you have a boss, that boss has a boss, etc. it what they call the career ladder; you&#39;re supposed to start at the bottom and climb your way to the top while stopping floor by floor helping around. The thing is; if everyone climbs to the top, who does the tasks at the bottom?</p>

<p>I love my profession. I have the capability to (and accidentally I&#39;ve had to) become a high-level manager, but there&#39;s a few problems: they don&#39;t do crap, let me explain: they don&#39;t build, create, or solve issues. They coordinate, steer the company and think of ways of making money, that&#39;s their function and I don&#39;t find that fulfilling in any way whatsoever. I&#39;m not helping anyone but myself, and <strong>I aspire to more than that</strong>.</p>

<p>So I refuse to climb the ladder, I&#39;ll stay here, building, creating and fixing, <strong>because at the end of the day, throwing money bills at a toilet doesn&#39;t fix the float and fill valve, a wrench does</strong>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
      <guid>https://metastable.cc/why-havent-you-progressed-to-position-in-your-career</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2026 11:50:58 +0000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Companies are doing AI wrong it&#39;s the stupidest thing ever</title>
      <link>https://metastable.cc/companies-are-doing-ai-wrong-its-the-stupidest-thing-ever</link>
      <description>&lt;![CDATA[After a couple of years of all companies pivoting everything to AI and entering what they call the &#34;Agentic Age&#34;, companies are now walking backwards because API and token pricing is higher than actually hiring a person to do the job.&#xA;&#xA;When we started using AI at $COMPANY, we tested that API trap, we burned almost 1k shekels in 20 days for something that arguably wasn&#39;t worth that much money. Then we got smarter and sought other ways of saving on costs, after all, AI wasn&#39;t providing us with better throughput.&#xA;&#xA;We tested local LLM deployments, specialized models... and then Anthropic released Claude Code for everyone without needing an API key, that&#39;s when everything changed. We tested and tested until we reached the conclusion that, despite certain limitations (that don&#39;t exist nowadays) that was the only acceptable and sustainable way of using AI as a tool without burying $COMPANY in the ground with stupid amounts of token debt. Things accelerated exponentially and our bet paid off, we have the same capabilities paying a Claude Max x20 as someone that is burning 10k/month for API tokens.&#xA;&#xA;And to this day, companies are blabbering about agentic and tokens like it makes any sense whatsoever. For me this is the &#34;Cloud Age&#34; all over again, systems that are designed for extremely complex or scalable needs being used by people who don&#39;t understand them, don&#39;t have those needs and pay blindly thinking it makes sense (that&#39;s another chapter, how the Cloud doesn&#39;t make sense and sensible companies are going back to bare metal).&#xA;&#xA;Anyway, let&#39;s keep watching the circus and let&#39;s see where it ends up (a bunch of dead companies, maroeconomics fucked, markets fucked, recession... ahem..)]]&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After a couple of years of all companies pivoting everything to AI and entering what they call the <em>“Agentic Age”</em>, companies are now walking backwards because API and token pricing is higher than actually hiring a person to do the job.</p>

<p>When we started using AI at <em>$COMPANY</em>, we tested that API trap, <strong>we burned almost 1k shekels in 20 days for something that arguably wasn&#39;t worth that much money</strong>. Then we got smarter and sought other ways of saving on costs, after all, AI wasn&#39;t providing us with better throughput.</p>

<p>We tested local LLM deployments, specialized models... and then Anthropic released Claude Code for everyone without needing an API key, that&#39;s when everything changed. We tested and tested until we reached the conclusion that, despite certain limitations (that don&#39;t exist nowadays) that was the only acceptable and sustainable way of using AI as a tool without burying <em>$COMPANY</em> in the ground with stupid amounts of <strong>token debt</strong>. Things accelerated exponentially and our bet paid off, we have the same capabilities paying a Claude Max x20 as someone that is burning 10k/month for API tokens.</p>

<p>And to this day, companies are blabbering about agentic and tokens like it makes any sense whatsoever. For me this is the <em>“Cloud Age”</em> all over again, systems that are designed for extremely complex or scalable needs being used by people who don&#39;t understand them, don&#39;t have those needs and pay blindly thinking it makes sense (that&#39;s another chapter, how the Cloud doesn&#39;t make sense and sensible companies are going back to bare metal).</p>

<p>Anyway, let&#39;s keep watching the circus and let&#39;s see where it ends up <em>(a bunch of dead companies, maroeconomics fucked, markets fucked, recession... ahem..)</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
      <guid>https://metastable.cc/companies-are-doing-ai-wrong-its-the-stupidest-thing-ever</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2026 21:32:18 +0000</pubDate>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>